A Midsummer Night's Dream, by William Shakespeare
One of Shakespeare's most-performed plays, A Midsummer Night's Dream is an amusing farce. It is not one of my favorites, but it is very light and amusing and inoffensive. I found the production of the parts about the fairies to be particularly well done. I also thought Bruce Dow was incredible as Bottom; he was the perfect actor for that role, and he played it wonderfully well. I also really enjoyed Adam Green as Puck. All in all, it was a light, amusing evening at the Shakespeare Theater.
Washington Post Review
Washingtonian Review
DC Metro Review
Showing posts with label Shakespeare Theatre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shakespeare Theatre. Show all posts
Friday, December 07, 2012
The Government Inspector by Nikolai Gogol
The Government Inspector, by Nikolai GogolPreviously, I had read the Collected Tales of Nikolai Gogol, and I consider him one of the greatest writers I have ever read. His short story, Diary of a Madman, is the most well-written story I have ever read. However, I feel that much of his writing was inconsequential and useless. I knew that this play was a satire; however, I didn't know whether I would find the play well-written or not. Fortunately, I loved the play. The play was a satire/comedy about life in Russia in the early 1800s, especially how those in positions of any power at all forced the powerless to pay bribes for everything. Corruption by government officials at all levels was rampant. The play showed the extreme lengths to which those same government officials would go to cover up their corruption. I really enjoyed this play.
The Government Inspector
Washington Post Review
Washingtonian Review
DC Metro Review
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Shakespeare Theatre 2012-13 Season
Shakespeare Theatre 2012-13 Season
The Government Inspector -- Nikolai Gogol
A Midsummer Night's Dream -- William Shakespeare
Hughie -- Eugene O'Neill
Wallenstein -- Friedrich Schiller
Coriolanus -- William Shakespeare
The Winter's Tale -- William Shakespeare
The Government Inspector -- Nikolai Gogol
A Midsummer Night's Dream -- William Shakespeare
Hughie -- Eugene O'Neill
Wallenstein -- Friedrich Schiller
Coriolanus -- William Shakespeare
The Winter's Tale -- William Shakespeare
Monday, November 07, 2011
The Boys From Syracuse -- Shakespeare Theatre

The Boys From Syracuse
The Boys From Syracuse is a musical based on Shakespeare's play, A Comedy of Errors. The musical was written by Richard Rogers and Lorenz Hart and first produced on Broadway in 1938. As described in The Washington Post review of this production, this "show was Shakespeare Theatre Company’s inaugural attempt at replicating, with an Elizabethan wink, New York’s highly successful and widely imitated Encores! concert series, which regularly blows the dust off vintage (and sometimes not-so-vintage) musicals." Shakespeare Theatre produced five weekend performances of the show. I loved the show, as I love musical theater. The play and the music leave one feeling happy and remind one of a golden age of musical theater in America, led by Richard Rogers, who teamed with Hart and later with Oscar Hammerstein, to write some of the greatest shows in Broadway history.
Thursday, October 20, 2011
The Heir Apparent -- Shakespeare Theatre

The Heir Apparent
Both newspaper reviews and audience reviews are posted on the official site. My own review: I enjoyed the play. This play was first staged in 1708 in Paris, and the original was translated and updated for this production. The play is a farce; it was intended to be slapstick humor. The play was not to be taken seriously; it was intended to amuse, and in my opinion, it succeeded. This play made me smile and even laugh at times. I loved the lighthearted nature of the play, and I left the theater feeling happy.
Shakespeare Theatre 2011-2012 Season
The Shakespeare Theatre celebrates its 25th Anniversary.
The 2011-2012 Anniversary Season
The Heir Apparent: Regnard's comic masterpiece adapted by David Ives and directed by Michael Kahn—the creative team behind last year's hit, The Liar.
Much Ado About Nothing: the always-charming romantic comedy, directed by Ethan McSweeny, will run during the holiday season.
The Two Gentlemen of Verona: Shakespeare’s classic tale of friendship, love and adventure, will be directed by PJ Paparelli.
Strange Interlude: Michael Kahn directs Eugene O’Neill’s Pulitzer Prize-winning, revolutionary drama, which has become a modern classic.
The Servant of Two Masters: Goldoni’s magical comedy will be restaged by Christopher Bayes after a sold-out run at Yale Repertory Theatre.
The Merry Wives of Windsor: Stephen Rayne will direct this bawdy and riotous Shakespeare play to close the season.
The 2011-2012 Anniversary Season
The Heir Apparent: Regnard's comic masterpiece adapted by David Ives and directed by Michael Kahn—the creative team behind last year's hit, The Liar.
Much Ado About Nothing: the always-charming romantic comedy, directed by Ethan McSweeny, will run during the holiday season.
The Two Gentlemen of Verona: Shakespeare’s classic tale of friendship, love and adventure, will be directed by PJ Paparelli.
Strange Interlude: Michael Kahn directs Eugene O’Neill’s Pulitzer Prize-winning, revolutionary drama, which has become a modern classic.
The Servant of Two Masters: Goldoni’s magical comedy will be restaged by Christopher Bayes after a sold-out run at Yale Repertory Theatre.
The Merry Wives of Windsor: Stephen Rayne will direct this bawdy and riotous Shakespeare play to close the season.
Monday, January 04, 2010
As You Like It, Shakespeare Theatre
Francesca Faridany as Rosalind and John Behlmann as Orlando in the Shakespeare Theatre Company’s production of William Shakespeare’s "As You Like It". Directed by Maria Aitken. Photo by Scott Suchman. As You Like It, Shakespeare Theatre
Saturday, November 28, 2009
The Alchemist, Shakespeare Theatre

The Alchemist by Ben Jonson
The Alchemist is a happy farce about con artists, who were rife in London at the time that the play was first performed in 1610. The play left the audience feeling happy.
Of course, here in Washington, we see political con artists every day, so we are accustomed to their misdeeds, although the con artists of today are more malevolent than the ones depicted in the play.
History and summary of the play, and a photo set of this production.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Phedre, Shakespeare Theatre
Phedre, Shakespeare TheatrePhedre with Helen Mirren. Phedre is a Greek tragedy, dating back to the fifth century, BC, of a woman who falls in love with her stepson and then struggles to manage her feelings, which consume her. Phedre is about a certain type of relationship, a forbidden one, and a woman's struggles to control her emotions, in the end, losing her struggle. This version of the play was written by the French writer, Racine, in 1677. The story is so tragic and so filled with negative emotion from start to finish that I had not felt good about going. However, I wanted to see Helen Mirren in her signature role. I was surprised that the play was not as difficult as I had expected it to be, although it is indeed filled with heart wrenching emotion from start to finish. Helen Mirren was really special. It is easy to see how great she is, and how this role has so come to define her career. The play was long -- with no intermission -- and I didn't get home until midnight.
The Washington Post ran a review of the opening night of Phedre.
The Baltimore Sun review.
The Examiner noted that for an extra payment, patrons could join Helen Mirren at a reception at the British Embassy. I didn't attend, but I did notice that a limousine was waiting for her outside the theater.
King Lear, Shakespeare Theatre
King Lear, Shakespeare TheatreKing Lear at the Shakespeare Theatre. The play was well done. Of course, it was what we all know, a tragedy -- not just any tragedy, but a Shakespeare tragedy. That means that everyone was killed in the end. It was gruesome. It seems that in Shakespeare's time, with only men in attendance at the shows, it must have been popular to have a lot of blood and killing in the shows, and that is what Shakespeare gave his audiences in his tragedies.
All Shakespeare plays have at least one play within the play, and this one was no exception. The "inset" play was also a tragedy, making the overall play a double tragedy. In both, the protagonist makes the same mistake, which leads to his downfall. In both, the protagonist disowns a child for perceived lack of love, but the perception was mistaken, and the other children, who feign love of their fathers, are really the ones who are taking advantage of their fathers falsely. The moral of the play was not to throw away the love of your children because if you do, you may be sorry later. Of course, Shakespeare plays, especially the tragedies, are overdone in order to please the audience, and I suppose that was also necessary to make the points emphatically in those days. The play was really well done, and as always, I enjoyed going.
Monday, June 08, 2009
Design for Living, Shakespeare Theatre

Robert Sella as Leo, Gretchen Egolf as Gilda and Tom Story as Otto in Noël Coward’s Design for Living, directed by Michael Kahn. Photo by Scott Suchman.
Design for Living, by Noel Coward
Shakespeare Theatre Company
Design for Living
Monday, April 06, 2009
Ion, Shakespeare Theatre

Lisa Harrow as Creusa and Keith Eric Chappelle as Ion in the Shakespeare Theatre Company’s production of Ion, directed by Ethan McSweeny. Photo by Carol Rosegg.
Ion, by Euripides at the Shakespeare Theatre Company.
Ion is called a Greek tragedy with a happy ending. It is the story of a woman who was separated from her son at birth and thought he was dead, but who found him again. Written by Euripides and performed about 412 BCE at the theatre of Dionysus in Athens. The play was written as a spiritual play about Greek Gods, as was expected of plays in that time. The Athenians knew the Ion myth well. Creusa was a teen-aged virgin who was impregnated by a Greek God, Apollo, and bore a son. Apollo warned her not to reveal that she was pregnant, and not to reveal the birth of the boy until he, Apollo, determined that the time was right for the son to be revealed.
The play is set at Delphi, at the temple of Apollo, where Ion was taken as a baby and raised by the priestess of the temple, and where Ion served happily as an acolyte of Apollo at the temple. Creusa, thinking her son was dead, comes to the temple to ask the oracle whether she will have other children. After almost 20 years, she is still in pain from the loss of her baby, and still angry at Apollo, questioning his motive and his treatment of her, not knowing that the time and place had come for Ion to be revealed and for him to take his rightful place as the son of a God, Apollo. Ion’s descendants established cities throughout the Aegean world, and those who settled in western Asia Minor were known as Ionians. Apollo's intent for Cerusa and Ion was not revealed by Apollo, but by an "angel", Athena, the Goddess of Athens, who comes to reveal the divine plan.
Although different in some ways, the play, Ion, has remarkable parallels with the Biblical story of Mary and Jesus. The Ion myth was well known throughout the region, and must have been known by those who wrote the books of the Bible, including Paul.
Note these similarities between the play and Biblical verses:
o At the temple, Ion says, "I will serve my master, Apollo, and never cease to worship the one through whom I live." And note the similarity in Acts 17:28 when Paul says, "For in Him we live and move and have our being."
o Ion tells Cerusa, "Dearest mother, here you see me in your arms, your son who was dead and yet was alive." And note the similarity in Ephesians 2:5, when Paul tells the Epesians, "Even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved)."
o Note that Apollo's plan for Cerusa was revealed by an "angel", Athena, and God's plan for Mary was revealed by an angel.
o Note also the prayer of Creusa to Leto: "O blessed Lady, mother of Apollo," which is similar to the prayer by many to Mary, the mother of Jesus.
o And finally, note that we are taught in the Bible, although we may not understand the "ways of the Lord", and at times we may in fact feel angry at Him, we must trust that He knows best. Similarly, Athena told Cerusa and Ion in the play that they were forgiven for their lack of faith in Apollo and even their anger toward him, "This I approve, thy former wayward thoughts resigned, with honour that thou name the god. Slow are the gifts of Heaven, but found at length not void of power."
Thus, the play was about not knowing what Spirit has in mind for us, but eventually learning after some time and hardship that events in our lives are for the best after all. Life is not random, not chance, but planned for our joy. I am reminded of this thought from "A Course in Miracles":
"What could you not accept if you but knew that every step you take, all events, past, present and to come, were gently planned by One whose only purpose is your good. While you made plans for death, He led you gently to eternal life."
"A Course in Miracles"
I am not a religious person in the sense of organized religion, but I am spiritual in the sense of letting Spirit guide my life. This thought often guides me, and it gives me peace of mind when things do not seem to be going the way I think I want.
Note the words of the play (as translated by Robert Potter, and the similarities to the Bible.
MINERVA (ATHENA)
Fly not; in me no enemy you fly;
At Athens friendly to you, and no less
Here. From that land I come, so named from me,
By Phoebus (Apollo) sent with speed: unmeet he deems it
To show himself before you, lest with blame
The past be mention'd; this he gave in charge,
To tell thee that she bore thee, and to him,
Phoebus thy father; he to whom he gave thee,
Not as to the author of thy being gives thee,
But to the inheritance of a noble house.
This declaration made, lest thou shouldst die,
Kill'd by thy mother's wily trains, or she
By thee, these means to save you he devised.
These things in silence long conceal'd, at Athens
The royal Phoebus would have made it known
That thou art sprung from her, thy father he:
But to discharge my office, and unfold
The oracle of the god, for which you yoked
Your chariots, hear: Creusa, take thy son,
Go to the land of Cecrops: let him mount
The royal throne; for, from Erechtheus sprung,
That honour is his due, the sovereignty
Over my country: through the states of Greece
Wide his renown shall spread;
For from his root
Four sons shall spring, that to the land, the tribes,
The dwellers on my rock, shall give their names.
Geleon the first, Hopletes, Argades,
And from my aegis named Aegicores:
Their sons in fate's appointed time shall fix
Their seats along the coast, or in the isles
Girt by the Aegean sea, and to my land
Give strength; extending thence the opposite plains
Of either continent shall make their own,
Europe and Asia, and shall boast their name
Ionians, from the honour'd Ion call'd.
To thee by Xuthus shall a son be born,
Dorus, from whom the Dorian state shall rise
To high renown; in the Pelopian land,
Another near the Rhian cliffs, along
The sea-wash'd coast, his potent monarchy
Shall stretch, Achaeus; and his subject realms
Shall glory in their chief's illustrious name.
Well hath Apollo quitted him in all:
First, without pain he caused thee bear a son.
That from thy friends thou mightst conceal his birth;
After the birth, soon as his infant limbs
Thy hands had clothed, to Mercury he gave
The charge to take the babe, and in his arms
Convey him hither; here with tenderness
He nurtured him, nor suffer'd him to perish.
Guard now the secret that he is thy son,
That his opinion Xuthus may enjoy
Delighted: thou too hast thy blessings, lady.
And now, farewell: from this relief from ills
A prosperous fortune I to both announce.
ION
O Pallas, daughter of all-powerful Jove!
Not with distrust shall we receive thy words:
I am convinced that Phoebus is my father,
My mother she, not unassured before.
CREUSA
Hear me too, now: Phoebus I praise, before
Unpraised; my son he now restores, of whom
Till now I deem'd him heedless. Now these gates
Are beauteous to mine eyes; his oracles
Now grateful to my soul, unpleasant late.
With rapture on these sounding rings my hands
Now hang; with rapture I address the gates.
MINERVA
This I approve, thy former wayward thoughts
Resign'd, with honour that thou name the god.
Slow are the gifts of Heaven, but found at length
Not void of power.
Monday, March 16, 2009
The Dog in the Manger, Shakespeare Theatre

Michael Hayden as Teodoro and Michelle Hurd as Diana in the Shakespeare Theatre Company’s production of The Dog in the Manger, directed by Jonathan Munby. Photo by Scott Suchman.
The Dog in the Manger, by Lope de Vega
Translation by David Johnston
Written in 1613, the play is a romantic comedy about forbidden love between a Countess, Diana, who falls in love with her servant, Teodoro, her secretary. One of the best performances I have seen at The Shakespeare Theatre. The background information provided by The Shakespeare Theatre is complete and excellent.
Synopsis
Lope de Vega
Timeline of the Spanish Golden Age
The Washington Post review is excellent.
Monday, July 07, 2008
The Imaginary Invalid, Shakespeare Theatre
The Imaginary Invalid, by Moliere
The Shakespeare Theatre
Rene Auberjonois as Argan in the Shakespeare Theatre Company’s production of The Imaginary Invalid, adapted by Alan Drury and directed by Keith Baxter. Photo by Carol Rosegg.
Monday, June 16, 2008
Julius Caesar, The Shakespeare Theatre
Scott Parkinson as Cassius, Dan Kremer as Julius Caesar and Tom Hammond as Brutus with the senate in the Shakespeare Theatre Company’s production of Julius Caesar, directed by David Muse. Photo by Carol Rosegg. Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare
See also: Julius Caesar
The Play
(This summary is based on background information from The Shakespeare Theatre website and from Isaac Asimov’s Guide To Shakespeare.)
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Antony and Cleopatra, The Shakespeare Theatre

Antony and Cleopatra by William Shakespeare
General Thoughts
It is important to be aware that this play is based on actual historical figures and historical events. The play was based on Plutarch’s history of Roman figures.
To me, however, this play is not solely about history; it is about emotional changes that occur in the lives of people, and about how history is shaped and changed by the emotional changes that occur in the lives of historical figures. This play is about Mark Antony’s letting go of his passion to be a great soldier and political figure, and becoming more enmeshed in his feelings, his emotional needs, for hedonism and for love. After Antony became focused on Cleopatra, he made numerous critical military and political errors that led to his downfall. Where he had previously been a great military general, he became ineffectual. And as in all lives, as we let go of our passion for our profession, someone else is there to fill the void. In Antony’s case, Octavius Caesar was there to fill the void left by Antony’s emotional departure.
How many times in life do we see famous and not so famous people reach a point in their lives when their mental focus changes from achievements in their profession to pleasure in one form or another. Sometimes, they become interested in drugs, or sexual pleasures, or perhaps in some other activity. And as their focus changes, their achievements in their profession diminish, often ending their professional careers. In this play and in history, Antony and Cleopatra lost their positions and their lives as their focus changed.
The Play
(This summary is based on background information from The Shakespeare Theatre website and from Isaac Asimov’s Guide To Shakespeare.)
Shakespeare was a showman, a producer of successful plays. For Shakespeare, setting five of his plays in the Roman Empire was good business. English school children read the works of the great Roman writers as the foundation of their classical education. A new translation of the historian Plutarch’s biography of the great Romans sold well, and plays about Rome filled theatres. In fact, the name of Julius Caesar appears in 17 different plays by Shakespeare, including his plays about English history.
Shakespeare’s England (itself a burgeoning empire in the 1590s) saw itself as the intellectual and historical heir to Rome. “To Shakespeare’s original audiences,” writes the scholar Marjorie Garber, “a play about ancient Rome was not an escapist document about a faraway world, but a powerful lesson in ethics and statecraft. The Elizabethan view of history suggested that the Romans provided models of conduct, that history taught, and that its lessons could—and should—be learned.”
After opening the Globe Theatre with his popular Julius Caesar in 1599 (based on Plutarch’s Roman history), William Shakespeare spent the next few years writing his great tragedies Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth and King Lear. He then returned to Plutarch’s history with Antony and Cleopatra in 1607.
In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare portrayed the last days of the Roman Republic. The conspirators assassinated Julius Caesar because they believed he was destroying their way of life and ushering in a new era of one-man rule, which would replace the republican virtues with the decadence of an empire.
After the death of Caesar, Mark Antony, the great war general under Caesar, defeated Brutus and Cassius at Philippi in 42 B.C. Then Antony, Octavius Caesar, and Lepidus formed a Triumvirate to rule the Roman Republic. Octavius was Caesar’s teenaged great-nephew; he was given Western Europe for his third of the Republic. Lepidus was awarded Africa; and Antony took the Eastern provinces.
According to Asimov, the East suited Mark Antony well; he was a soldier and a hedonist who had never gotten along well in Rome and preferred the Eastern provinces. Although Antony ruled the Eastern provinces, his passion for war and politics waned, and he became more emotionally drawn to hedonism. He made his headquarters in Tarsus, from which he summoned Cleopatra in 41 B.C. for the purpose of extorting money as a way of her retaining her position of Queen of Egypt. However, when Cleopatra arrived to meet him, Mark Antony’s life changed forever.
Plutarch described the scene of Cleopatra’s arrival in Tarsus, and Shakespeare improved the description with his poetic imagination.
"The barge she sat in, like a burnished throne,
Burned on the water; the poop was beaten gold;
Purple the sails, and so perfumed that
The winds were lovesick with them; the oars were silver,
Which to the tune of flutes kept stroke and made
The water which they beat to follow faster,
As amorous of their strokes. For her own person,
It beggared all description: she did lie
In her pavilion, cloth-of-gold of tissue,
O’erpicturing that Venus where we see
The fancy outwork nature: on each side her
Stood pretty dimpled boys, like smiling Cupids,
With divers-colored fans, whose wind did seem
To glow the delicate cheeks which they did cool,
And what they undid, did."
When Cleopatra invited Mark Antony to board her barge, he went in what was almost a hypnotic trance, and was her slave from that moment.
Some scholars might object that there are fundamental inconsistencies between the two plays in the character of Mark Antony. In Julius Caesar, Antony comes across as a master politician, able to manipulate the mob in Rome and defeat Caesar’s assassins in the public forum and on the battlefield. By contrast, in Antony and Cleopatra, he appears to be militarily incompetent and politically ineffective, frittering away his share of imperial command for the sake of his sensual indulgence with Cleopatra. Which is the real Antony—the Master of the West or the Playboy of the Eastern World? He was both.
Already in Julius Caesar, Antony appears as something of a playboy, foreshadowing his role in the later play. Julius Caesar says that he prefers the fun-loving Antony to men obsessed with politics like Cassius:
“He loves no plays, as thou dost, Antony;
He hears no music.”
Indeed, Antony evidently has a reputation as a party animal in Rome. When he shows up to accompany Caesar to the Senate in the morning, Julius is surprised:
“See! Antony, that revels long a-nights,
Is notwithstanding up.”
In Antony’s bitter confrontation with the conspirators before the battle of Philippi, Cassius harks back to his reputation as “a reveller.” In fact, the conspirators fatally underestimate Antony’s political capacity precisely because of his playboy image. In deciding not to kill Antony along with Caesar, Brutus dismisses his political importance:
“He is given to sports, to wildness, and much company.”
He was generally thought of as a political lightweight, more interested in partying than ruling the city. What, then, transforms Antony into the powerful political force we see in Julius Caesar? The answer is the murder of Julius Caesar, to whom Antony felt complete loyalty. In a heroic act of self-mastery, Antony pulls himself together in the political crisis created by the assassination and devotes himself whole-heartedly to avenging his lord’s death and bringing down the conspirators. The memory of Julius Caesar gives Antony a cause worth fighting for, and, if need be, dying for. To Antony, Julius Caesar was:
“The noblest man / That ever lived in the tide of times.”
But the fact that it takes Caesar’s death to transform Antony from a playboy to a master politician has ominous implications for his future. It threatens to leave a void in his life once he accomplishes his revenge and no longer has Caesar as a cause to fight for. In Julius Caesar, his master’s death taught Antony a lesson in the vanity of ordinary political achievement:
“O mighty Caesar! Dost thou lie so low?
Are all thy conquests, glories, triumphs, spoils
Shrunk to this little measure?”
Given this insight, it is no wonder that Antony does not pursue political power with the single-mindedness of his rival Octavius.
Antony’s meeting of Cleopatra and his disillusionment with the imperial political system reignite the impulses that only his devotion to Julius Caesar held in check. As Cleopatra comes to mean more and more to Antony, Rome comes to mean less and less. Cleopatra becomes the justification of his very existence.
Although he was young, Caesar’s teenaged great-nephew and heir Octavius was one of the master politicians of history. He deftly stepped into the void created by Antony’s change of focus and began his march to take control of all of the Roman Republic. First, he officially changed his name to Julius Caesar, immediately winning the loyalty of both the people and Caesar’s military legions on the historical strength of the name alone. He then embarked on a systematic propaganda campaign to depict Antony as an enemy of Rome. He made sure that all of Rome knew of Antony’s associations with the shameless foreign queen, Cleopatra. “Contemning Rome, he has done all this,” says Shakespeare’s Octavius, erasing Antony’s history as a defender of Rome and of Caesar’s memory. He read Antony’s private will in the Senate, revealing that Antony had made his children with Cleopatra his heirs and had requested to be buried in Egypt.
For his part, Antony critically underestimated Octavius’ skill. Shakespeare’s Antony sees himself as an invincible general and cannot conceive of losing a battle to Octavius, whom he remembers as a boy who “no practice had in the brave squares of war.” When he loses to Octavius’ talented lieutenants, the shame is too great to bear. Octavius portrays Antony as a hopeless case and an enemy of Rome, and Antony’s allies defect to Octavius without resistance. Dogged by his own history, by the memory of the great man he used to be, Antony would prefer death to “the inevitable prosecution of disgrace and horror.” The man who had shaped history so skillfully at Caesar’s funeral now becomes one of its victims.
Cleopatra
By all accounts, Cleopatra was no ordinary woman.
Cleopatra was not “Egyptian”; she was Greek. Egypt had become the kingdom of Cleopatra’s forebears in 323 B.C. when one of the generals of Alexander the Great, Ptolemy, seized Egypt. From that time, his descendants, each named Ptolemy, ruled Egypt. All of the Ptolemys married Greeks, and all of the rulers of Egypt were completely Greek. They did not even speak Egyptian; they spoke Greek. A number of the Ptolemaic queens were named Cleopatra, meaning “glory of her father” in Greek. The Cleopatra in this play was Cleopatra VII.
When Cleopatra met Mark Antony, she was 28 years old. She was born in 69 B.C. and succeeded to the throne when she was only 17, on the death of her father. In 48 B.C., Julius Caesar landed in Alexandria in pursuit of Pompey. Cleopatra realized that the real power in the world lay in Rome, and she formed a liaison with Caesar and had a son with him. Seven years later, when she was summoned to Tarsus by Mark Antony, she again took the action that was necessary to retain her kingdom in seducing Antony.
In Antony and Cleopatra, Shakespeare gave us the greatest description of complete feminine charm the world of literature has ever offered. He said of the possibility of Antony leaving Cleopatra:
“Never; he will not;
Age cannot wither her, nor custom stale
Her infinite variety; other women cloy
The appetites they feed, but she makes hungry
Where most she satisfies; for vilest things
Become themselves in her, that holy priests
Bless her when she is riggish.”
And by comparison, other women were like Octavia:
“Octavia is of a holy, cold and still conversation.”
Cleopatra was "an infinite variety". When other women left a man satisfied, Cleopatra only made him hungrier for more of her. And when she was wanton, the holy priests themselves blessed her.
Incidentally, I felt that this play was not well cast. Cleopatra was 28 years old when she met Marc Antony, and only 40 when she died. She had three children with him. But the woman who was cast in the role of Cleopatra in this play was Suzanne Bertish, a British actress of 55, who looked every day of her age. I felt that she was FAR too old to play Cleopatra.
Daemons
The Greeks believed that with each individual was associated a divine spirit through which the influence of the gods could make itself felt. It was when this influence was most strongly felt that a man could attain heights otherwise impossible to him. If a spirit was continually felt, a man would be of unusual power and ability. This belief was elaborated that each individual was thought to have two such spirits, one for good and one for evil, the two continually fighting for mastery.
To the Greeks, such a spirit was called a "daimon" -- meaning "divinity" -- or "guardian spirit"; the Latin spelling was "daemon". Later, the Christians cast these daemons, being pagan beliefs, as evil, and therefore we get our present "demon", meaning an evil spirit. However, the Greek idea lives on today; we still speak of "guardian angels" and sometimes we envision an individual as being influenced by his better or worse nature.
The soothsayer in the play tells Antony that Octavius Caesar's daemon is inferior to Antony's, but it can still win, so Antony should avoid Octavius.
"Therefore, O Antony, stay not by his side,
Thy daemon, thy spirit which keeps thee, is
Noble, courageous, high, unmatchable,
Where Caesar's is not. But near him, thy angel
Becomes afeared, as being o'erpow'red: therefore,
Make space enough between you."
Synopsis of the play
Antony, Octavius and Lepidus rule the Roman Empire, but Antony has fallen in love with the Egyptian queen Cleopatra and disregards all news from Rome. When Antony hears that his wife, Fulvia, has died, however, he returns home.
In order to pacify Octavius, who is under attack from the late Pompey’s son, Antony agrees to marry Octavius’ sister, Octavia. Antony, Octavius and Lepidus meet with Pompey before the battle and instead sign a treaty to stave off war.
As soon as Antony and Octavia depart for Greece, Octavius immediately starts a new war on Pompey in defiance of the treaty with Antony and Lepidus. Octavia goes to Rome to patch up the quarrel, where Octavius informs her that Antony has fled to Cleopatra in Egypt.
Angry at his sister’s humiliation, Octavius sails east to fight Antony at sea. Cleopatra offers her navy to supplement Antony’s, but she retreats in the middle of the battle, and Antony follows her.
Antony returns to battle and defeats Octavius by land. But Octavius wins another sea battle, and Cleopatra’s navy surrenders, enraging Antony. Despondent at his rejection, she goes to her monument and sends word to Antony that she has died. Antony falls on his sword, only to learn too late of her ruse. He asks to be taken to Cleopatra and dies in her arms.
Learning that Octavius intends to bring her to Rome as a prisoner, Cleopatra kills herself with poisonous snakes smuggled into the monument. Finding her dead, Octavius promises to bury her with Antony.
After defeating Antony and Cleopatra in battle, Octavius finished the job his great-uncle Caesar had begun; the Senate granted him dictatorial powers, and the Roman Empire was founded. Caesar’s ghost of history could finally rest, and Octavius received the new name Augustus (“the lofty one”) – the same Augustus Caesar in the Bible.
Washington Post review.
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Major Barbara, Shakespeare Theatre

Major Barbara by George Bernard Shaw
Shakespeare Theatre
Major Barbara, written by George Bernard Shaw in 1905, is a play that seeks to understand religion or spirituality. Shaw introduced what has come to be known as the "discussion play" — that is, works primarily driven by debate of ideas. In this play, Shaw delved into the concept of spirituality by pitting two opposing concepts portrayed by a father and his daughter. Barbara, a major in the Salvation Army, argues that salvation is spiritual, apart from the cares of this world and cannot be purchased with money. Andrew Undershaft, her father, argues that salvation is material and is obtained with money. Poverty is the opposite of salvation; indeed, the term "salvation" means salvation from poverty.
Throughout recorded history, people have struggled to understand spirituality. Shaw did not attempt to examine all concepts of religion, but instead chose to examine two "classes" of ideas of religion — the spiritual approach vs. the material approach. Recall the biblical phrase that man cannot serve both God and mammon. Shaw argued that man cannot accept a spiritual salvation until he has first obtained sufficient money to permit himself to live comfortably. Thus, Shaw argued that material salvation must preceed spiritual salvation.
In the play, Shaw argues (through Undershaft) that the "sin" of poverty is the cause of the world's problems, and that "salvation" from poverty lies within oneself. One is "saved" from poverty through one's own decision to let go of poverty and then taking the steps to overcome it. Shaw argues that people decide whether to accept lives of poverty or to be saved from poverty. In the play, Undershaft describes his own epiphany leading to his own "salvation". One is reminded of Nelson Mandela's quote that his own sister chose poverty and slavery for herself by choosing not to be educated. In the play, Shaw describes the conversion of Barbara by her father to his concept of salvation.
George Bernard Shaw was born a Protestant in a predominantly Catholic Dublin in 1856. In 1884, Shaw joined the Fabian Society, an organization of middle-class socialists dedicated to mass education and legislative reform in England. He remained active in the Fabian Society until his death at age 94 in 1950. With the outbreak of World War I, which for him tolled the death knell of the capitalist system, Shaw published a series of anti-war newspaper articles entitled "Common Sense about the War." This series temporarily ruined his public reputation until 1923, when his Saint Joan returned his glory. Shaw won the Nobel Prize for literature in 1925.
Monday, February 11, 2008
Argonautika, Shakespeare Theatre

Argonautika
Shakespeare Theatre
Deep, agonizing, uncontrollable emotional pain can be understood fully only by those who have experienced it. We can relate to those who experience such pain only if we, too, have known it, only if our own souls have felt the depths of such agony and despair.
Medea felt such pain. She felt its horror sweep over her and sear her soul, a horror that could not be eased, no matter how much she desired. She felt the uncontrollable, unquenchable emotional need to respond to her pain by hurting the one who caused it. She needed to convey to him, to Jason, the depth of her agony. And so she murdered the one for whom he left her, and the two sons that she had with him, the children she loved as life itself. She desperately wanted him to know, to feel, how deeply he had hurt her, how overwhelmed she was with grief.
To convey this story, this powerful feeling, Mary Zimmerman combined the story of Argonautica, written in the third century BC, with the play, Medea, written by Euripides in 431 BC. Only by first informing the audience of the story of Jason could she adequately convey to the audience the overwhelming depth of the pain of Medea. Only by relating the story of how Jason had relied on Medea to save him from certain death, of how she had even killed her own brother to save Jason's life, of how Jason had promised his undying love for her, could we fully understand her feelings of grief when he left her, casting her aside for another. Without the one story, the other would be insufficient, shallow, not understood. But in the combining of these stories, the deep agony of Medea was conveyed with full meaning, full force, full understanding.
This story is powerful, and it is easy to understand how it could have survived more than two thousand years, and yet be as meaningful today as then. The combining of these two powerful stories leaves one with feelings that go deep and stay fully realized in one's emotions long after the play is over. This play was great.
Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Edward II by Christopher Marlowe
Edward II by Christopher Marlowe
Shakespeare Theatre Company
As Tamburlaine was Marlowe's first play, Edward II was his final play -- the bookends of his professional career and his life. Written in response to a challenge by Shakespeare, Edward II is a play about a man who threw away his position as king and his life because of a self-destructive character flaw. Edward was so bent on uncontrolled debauchery that he squandered his country's riches and placed it in danger of collapse. As a result, he was overthrown and then killed.
I have three thoughts about the play: First, Edward's debauchery was of a homosexual nature (and very well portrayed in the play). If it had been of a "straight sexual" nature, it might have been tolerated somewhat longer, although the end result would probably have been the same. Edward's debauchery was not the result of his homosexuality, but the result of a deep character flaw of being completely unable to recognize and accept any responsiblity in life, of being desperately bent on his own self destruction.
Second, audiences at the time of this play (1592) seem to have been attracted to wildly overwrought melodrama, and this play was filled with such theatrics. I found the unceasing and greatly excessive whining and writhing by Edward II and others in the play to be nauseating. I realize that a new art form was created by Marlowe, and for that reason, I wanted to see the play; however, I found the play itself revolting.
Third, I thought the play was well cast. Although I did not enjoy the role of Edward II, Wallace Acton played the role extremely well. However, the performer in the play who most attracted my attention, and the one I will remember most, was Deanne Lorette, who played Isabella, the wife of Edward II. She was incredibly sexy and conniving, and I found that I simply could not take my eyes off of her whenever she was on stage. I will certainly look for her in the future.
Shakespeare Theatre Company
As Tamburlaine was Marlowe's first play, Edward II was his final play -- the bookends of his professional career and his life. Written in response to a challenge by Shakespeare, Edward II is a play about a man who threw away his position as king and his life because of a self-destructive character flaw. Edward was so bent on uncontrolled debauchery that he squandered his country's riches and placed it in danger of collapse. As a result, he was overthrown and then killed.
I have three thoughts about the play: First, Edward's debauchery was of a homosexual nature (and very well portrayed in the play). If it had been of a "straight sexual" nature, it might have been tolerated somewhat longer, although the end result would probably have been the same. Edward's debauchery was not the result of his homosexuality, but the result of a deep character flaw of being completely unable to recognize and accept any responsiblity in life, of being desperately bent on his own self destruction.
Second, audiences at the time of this play (1592) seem to have been attracted to wildly overwrought melodrama, and this play was filled with such theatrics. I found the unceasing and greatly excessive whining and writhing by Edward II and others in the play to be nauseating. I realize that a new art form was created by Marlowe, and for that reason, I wanted to see the play; however, I found the play itself revolting.
Third, I thought the play was well cast. Although I did not enjoy the role of Edward II, Wallace Acton played the role extremely well. However, the performer in the play who most attracted my attention, and the one I will remember most, was Deanne Lorette, who played Isabella, the wife of Edward II. She was incredibly sexy and conniving, and I found that I simply could not take my eyes off of her whenever she was on stage. I will certainly look for her in the future.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
Tamburlaine, Christopher Marlowe
Tamburlaine, by Christopher Marlowe
Shakespeare Theatre Company
Sidney Harmon Hall
Who was Christopher Marlowe, and why do we care? Christopher Marlowe invented the dramatic form that Shakespeare copied and perfected. Tamburlaine was Marlowe's first play, and with it, he completely changed drama. He introduced the use of blank verse, combining it with sweeping historical drama. Tamburlaine was a huge success, and Shakespeare immediately copied it, as he copied so many ideas in his plays. Marlowe died at the age of 29, after writing only one more significant play, Edward II(which will be performed later), and Shakespeare went on to perfect the new dramatic style.
Like many plays (and stories), Tamburlaine is a play about a man whose great achievements were eventually undone by his character flaws. Because I don't particularly enjoy watching a person's life crumble because of self-destructive character flaws, I did not find the play particularly interesting. So many times in life we see people destroy their lives through self-destructive psychological problems, and it is always sad. Plays about people who succeed because of personality traits are much more inspiring and enjoyable to me.
Shakespeare Theatre Company
Sidney Harmon Hall
Who was Christopher Marlowe, and why do we care? Christopher Marlowe invented the dramatic form that Shakespeare copied and perfected. Tamburlaine was Marlowe's first play, and with it, he completely changed drama. He introduced the use of blank verse, combining it with sweeping historical drama. Tamburlaine was a huge success, and Shakespeare immediately copied it, as he copied so many ideas in his plays. Marlowe died at the age of 29, after writing only one more significant play, Edward II(which will be performed later), and Shakespeare went on to perfect the new dramatic style.
Like many plays (and stories), Tamburlaine is a play about a man whose great achievements were eventually undone by his character flaws. Because I don't particularly enjoy watching a person's life crumble because of self-destructive character flaws, I did not find the play particularly interesting. So many times in life we see people destroy their lives through self-destructive psychological problems, and it is always sad. Plays about people who succeed because of personality traits are much more inspiring and enjoyable to me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
